🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive policy to ban social media access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and families are watching intently to see if this tactic will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

The European Trend

In Europe, a rising group of countries are exploring similar bans.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader arguing that phones and networks are "taking away our children's youth". Legislation may be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to shield the young from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to confirm the user details of social media users. The media minister have indicated that an Australia-style ban remains "one of the options in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has asked the legislature to approve a bill raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has suggested a comparable action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in the Netherlands has urged parents to prevent their children from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has approved a advisory motion supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 without parental consent is provided. While it warns of the "habit-forming" quality of these services, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a good starting point," commented a leading European lawmaker driving the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Stance

In the UK, the administration has kept open a future ban, arguing that "no option is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "supported by conclusive research".

Previously, support grew behind a bill to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately modified. However, the administration committed to further research the issue.

Campaign organizations have raised concerns. One foundation established by the family of a young person who died after being exposed to disturbing online content contends that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when teens reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are secure and suitable for children," said a prominent peer.

America: A Decentralized Approach

Stateside, legislation is largely happening at the state level due to national inaction.

• Utah requires guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a bill barring under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a rule limiting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with additional time requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed measures demanding adult authorization for teenagers to create social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from various figures to follow Australia's path, a nationwide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

International Views

Beyond these regions, additional countries are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies take a more cautious tone. Unicef has cautioned that social media bans have downsides and "might prove counterproductive". The agency points out that social networks can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to invest in child safeguards.

While this worldwide conversation continues, the steps of this nation and several other countries demonstrate that policymakers internationally are no longer willing to wait for the industry to act voluntarily.